Placentia School District Considers Immigration Enforcement Policy, Sparking Community Concern
Community Opposes Placentia-Yorba Linda School District’s Immigration Resolution
On Tuesday, a significant outpouring of public dissent emerged as community members confronted leaders of the Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District regarding a proposed resolution supporting immigration enforcement. The overwhelming majority of speakers — over 50 individuals — voiced their opposition to the motion.
Following an extensive session of public comments, the school district opted not to advance the resolution. However, discussions continue regarding a motion that would allow school staff to refrain from interfering with immigration actions taking place on campus.
Heaven Casey, a parent within the district, emphasized the importance of creating a safe environment for students. "We are responsible for these children, and without the safety net that we have within this school district, these children are not going to feel safe," she stated.
Conversely, some parents expressed support for the resolution. Vance Stubbs, another PYLUSD parent, said, “Parents deserve to know our district will not pick and choose which laws or officers it respects.”
The motion garnered support from Trustee Leandra Blades, who faced significant backlash from attendees. Immigration attorney Bethany Anderson directed sharp criticism toward Blades, urging, “Ms. Blades, if you cannot uphold your duty to protect all students and follow the law, you should resign immediately.”
In response to the criticism, Blades clarified her stance, asserting that her intention was to endorse collaboration with local, state, and federal law enforcement. She noted that the language regarding staff non-interference with immigration actions aligns with a newly mandated state policy requiring district personnel to verify warrants or subpoenas from immigration agents. “We’re not going to have employees that are going to impede or block or cause an even bigger situation,” she explained. “We want law enforcement to be on our campuses to keep our students safe.”
In conclusion, the board decided to release a statement affirming its support for all law enforcement. Additionally, they granted initial approval for the motion concerning non-interference with immigration actions, although the policy will require another vote in an upcoming meeting next month.
